International Money and Finance (Final stage 3) Essay - 2

International Money and Finance (Final stage 3) - Essay ExampleThe companionships yearbook report 2010 provides clues on the exchange run risks. Operating Statistics Number of rental stores Staff numbers 31 October 30 April 31 October 30 April 2010 2009 2010 2010 2009 2010 Sunbelt Rentals 346 397 393 5,373 5,733 5,334 A-Plant 104 111 105 1,876 1,944 1,872 Corporate office - - - 11 12 12 free radical 450 508 498 7,260 7,689 7,218 The operating statistics on the number of rental stores and staff strength provide a comparative belief of the performance of the Ashtead Group in the years 2009 and 2010 respectively in Sunbelt Rentals and A-Plant (Ashtead Group Press Release, 2011). Exchange esteem Risk Ashtead Group is exposed to exchange rate risk developed from commentary risk appear from most of the company assets, liabilities, income and be written in the US dollars. The changes in the comparative value of nonplus sterling(prenominal) and the US dollar can bushel on the fin ancial strength and functioning of the company. all(prenominal) debt of the company is shown in the US dollars to secure to a certain extent the revenue stream, hedging against the translation effects erupting from the shift in the dollar exchange rate. The company pays dollar interest on its debts to trim back the impact of any shift in the dollar exchange rate on its income (Ashtead Group yearbook Report Accounts, 2010). Movements in the rate of the US dollar with respect to Pound Sterling has been having and crucial impact on our financial position and discovercomes of operations as registered in pounds are because most of the company assets, liabilities, income and costs are represented in US dollars. Movement in the pic of the firm against Pound Sterling or other currencies however, can create significant transaction exposure for the firm. Higher level of exposure can affect the firms short term cash flows and therefore may withdraw the firm to borrow to meet its short te rm cash requirements. (Moffett, Stonehill, & Eiteman,2009). Till 31 October 2010 all company debts shown in the US dollar were nearly 80% of the value of net assets shown in dollar. It proved out to be robust hedge against currency fluctuations. It reduces the impact of exchange rate fluctuations as interest is nonrecreational through dollar as well, thus, reducing the effect on pre-tax profits and income. Based on the modish currency mix of Ashtead Groups profits and on dollar debt levels, interest and exchange judge at 31 October 2010, a 1% change in the US dollar exchange rate would impact pre-tax profit by ?40,000 (Ashtead Group Press Release, 2011). The company has been benefitting from the strong dollar in the past, as is evident from the results of Sunbelt from stronger dollar in the year 2009 when revenues in dollar were short by 21% crosswise the year to US$1450 million but in reality increased by 7% when shown in UK sterling (International Rental News, 2009). Ashteads S unbelt results were boosted by the stronger dollar. Sunbelts revenues in dollars fell by 21% over the year to US$1450 million, although actually grew by 7% when expressed in UK sterling. A-Plants sales for the year fell by 2% to 208.0 pounds sterling million. Dollar exchange rate hedging worked well for the company in the year 2009 amidst reducing sales for both the companies of the group in the final quarter with 28% cut in income by A-Plant and 24% reduction in the income of Senbelt in local