Final Exam Worl War II Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Final Exam Worl War II - Assignment ExampleLegally the British had no right to interfere with Germanys annexation of intermit of Czechoslovakia. Germany and Czechoslovakias fight was surrounded by them. large(p) Britain could advise the both countries, but had no stake in the fight. Chamberlain did not have a choice but to act in the manner he did. history has do him look like a coward. This is not true. Chamberlain dealt with Germany in a logical manner. Two factors made Chamberlain negotiate with Germany instead of declaring war. The first factor was Chamberlain wanted to maintain peace on the European continent. The mho factor was the lack of a treaty between Great Britain and Czechoslovakia. Great Britain and France dealt with Germany diplomatically due to these two factors. History might have been polar if Germany tried to annex Poland first. Great Britain and France had a nonaggression treaty with Poland. so Poland and Germanys fight was a British and French fight. His tory might have also been different if Czechoslovakia had made a treaty with Great Britain and France before Germanys aggression. Basically Chamberlain acted in a prudent manner. He had no way of knowing the chaos that would ensue from encouraging Hitler. Chamberlain was a prime rector he could not read minds or the future.If a simple lesson is to be learned from the situation between Chamberlain and Hitler, it would be do not let care of the past shadow the future. Chamberlain was frightened by the Great War, like most of his generation. The carnage of World War I would frighten any sane person. This fear might have been more of a deciding factor than the legal aspect for Britain and Frances policies toward Germany during this time. cultism might have blinded Chamberlain into believing Hitlers lies more easily. Fear should not have been a factor, but in Chamberlains defense, he was acting out of fear for his country.2. There were